if I told you he “DOES”, but just does not want to<\/p>\n enforce it, because…he’s just a lying hateful prick<\/p>\n Judge Anthony “Archie Bunker” Scalia decided to<\/p>\n speak to a “conservative christian audience” on it:<\/p>\n \u00e2\u20ac\u0153I think the main fight is to dissuade Americans from Oh he’s not done by a long shot. Then dip ass said:<\/p>\n \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Our latest [The courts] take on the subject which is Um, from the…Constitution<\/em>. This is like some idiot<\/em><\/p>\n saying “Where in this Rules To The Road handbook<\/p>\n do they cover speeding?!? It’s not even IN there!!”<\/p>\n Yes, page 34, page 67, page 83 & 91 ya silly moron<\/p>\n Thomas Jefferson’s letter’s to the Danbury Baptists<\/a><\/p>\n existed you evil, lying, old seditious Jabba The Hut<\/em><\/p>\n Tommy j was damn clear with “thus building a wall<\/p>\n of separation between Church & State”. But ohhhhh<\/p>\n noooooooooooooo. Not for for ol’ “Sausage Fingers”<\/p>\n![\"scaliafunny1\"](\"https:\/\/www.bolgernow.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/10\/scaliafunny1-300x294.jpg\")
<\/a>(“I don’t use this”)<\/p>\n
\nwhat the secularists are trying to persuade them to be
\ntrue: that the separation of church & state means that
\nthe government can’t favor religion over non-religion,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/p>\n
\nquite different from previous takes, is that, the state
\nmust be neutral, not only between religions, BUT be-
\ntween religion & non-religion. That\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s just a lie. Where
\ndo you get the notion that this is all unconstitutional?”<\/p>\n![\"Scalia](\"https:\/\/www.bolgernow.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/10\/Scalia-for-Bunker.jpg\")
<\/a>\u00c2\u00a0 ![\"archie_bunker\"](\"https:\/\/www.bolgernow.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/10\/archie_bunker.jpg\")
<\/a>(Separated at birth?)<\/p>\n
![\"Thomas](\"https:\/\/www.bolgernow.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/10\/thomas_jefferson_3rd_president_of_the_united_states-249x300.jpg\")
<\/a>(“Ya fucked up!”)<\/p>\n